Welcome

Dear Friends,
Welcome Aboard ! If you are here you are the chosen Ones :)the priviliged ones to be invited to be part of this Blog.Have been wandering ...in search of answers about Life.. rebirth Karma...the recent PLR workshop and training conducted by dr Newton of Life research Academy has given me so many answers.and i can say i am blessed to have had the opportunity to be trained to become one of the light workers in the field of PLR therapy in India.

Please free to add on to the respective blogs and also do send me your suggestions for ideas to make this interactive blog fun and informative.

luvnlight
Suchitra

Since i chose this name for the blog it seems right to write about “the collective unconsciousness”
Read on and please do add your comments:
Collective unconscious is a term of analytical psychology originally coined by Carl Jung. While Freud did not distinguish between an “individual psychology” and a “collective psychology”, Jung distinguished the collective unconscious from the personal unconscious particular to each human being.
The collective unconscious refers to that part of a person’s unconscious which is common to all human beings. It contains archetypes, which are forms or symbols that are manifested by all people in all cultures. They are said to exist prior to experience, and are in this sense instinctual. Critics have argued that this is an ethnocentrist view, which universalized Jung’s European-styled archetypes into human beings’ archetypes.
Less mystical proponents of the Jungian model hold that the collective unconscious can be adequately explained as arising in each individual from shared instinct, common experience, and shared culture. The natural process of generalization in the human mind combines these common traits and experiences into a mostly identical substratum of the unconscious.
For example, the archetype of “the great mother” would be expected to be very nearly the same in all people, since all infants share inherent expectation of having an attentive caretaker (human instinct); every surviving infant must either have had a mother, or a surrogate (common experience); and nearly every child is indoctrinated with society’s idea of what a mother should be (shared culture). The amalgam of all these effects could be the source of the shared figure, or archetype, which reportedly appears very nearly the same in most peoples’ dreams.
Regardless of whether the individual’s connection to the collective unconscious arises from mundane or mystical means, the term collective unconscious describes an important commonality that is observed to exist between different individuals’ dreams. It was simply formulated by Jung as a model.
The term Synchronicity also has a new orld of meaning for me now…hats off to Jung for coining such a term
Synchronicity is a word coined by the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung to describe the “temporally coincident occurrences of acausal events.” Jung spoke of synchronicity as an “acausal connecting principle” (i.e. a pattern of connection that cannot be explained by direct causality). Plainly put, it is the experience of having two (or more) things happen coincidentally in a manner that is meaningful to the person or persons experiencing them, where that meaning suggests an underlying pattern. It differs from coincidence in that synchronicity implies not just a happenstance, but an underlying pattern or dynamic that is being expressed through meaningful relationships or events. It was a principle that Jung felt encompassed his concepts of archetypes and the collective unconscious, in that it was descriptive of a governing dynamic that underlay the whole of human experience and history—social, emotional, psychological, and spiritual. Jung believed that many experiences perceived as coincidence were due not merely to chance, but instead, suggested the manifestation of parallel events or circumstances reflecting this governing dynamic1.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia